Christine Smith’s Blog

Courage in the Face of Death: The White Rose & Sophie Scholl Story

“…The imperialist ideology of force, from whatever side it comes, must be shattered for all time….”-from “Leaflet of Resistance” from The White Rose

The White Rose was a resistance group of college students in Germany who boldly exposed the hatred of Nazi ideology and addressed the evils of the mistreatment of and the extermination of the Jews under Hitler. Reading the text of the pamphlets these young adults produced and distributed, I find myself touched by not only their courageous devotion to writing the truth at a time when doing so would mean one’s death, but deeply impressed with the prose itself. It powerfully states precisely what was going on in the midst of all who chose to ignore what was all around them, identifying all who apathetically accepted Hitler’s crimes as being guilty, too, as they acquiesced rather than opposed it.

To express such opposition to the government at a time when Germans were dying in the war and many were enthralled by the Nazi regime, and knowing that such dissent was punishable by death, required an extraordinary courage rarely seen. Informants for the Gestapo, who could be anyone you knew, were always a threat.

“Nothing is so unworthy of a civilized nation as allowing itself to be “governed” without opposition by an irresponsible clique that has yielded to base instinct…if they abandon the will to take decisive action and turn the wheel of history and thus subject it to their own rational decision; if they are so devoid of all individuality, have already gone so far along the road toward turning into a spiritless and cowardly mass - then, yes, they deserve their downfall…”- from The First Leaflet of The White Rose

Sharing what they learned from “illegal” sources (the listening to of which was punishable by death) such as foreign radio broadcasts, the students wrote in hope that the people of Germany would listen, understand, and choose to resist in the ways they could. They maintained every individual could, in some way, resist and that together the goal of bringing to an end the “monster of a state” National Socialism was possible. “Passive resistance” was an option for all they maintained. The White Rose insisted that all who recognized what the dictatorship of the National Socialist Party was doing to Germany and to humanity should do what they could to end it and its continuation of the war. Every pamphlet from The White Rose asked the reader to copy and distribute it.

“…Why do the German people behave so apathetically in the face of
all these abominable crimes, crimes so unworthy of the human race?…For through his apathetic behavior he gives these evil men the opportunity to act as
they do; he tolerates this “government” which has taken upon itself such an infinitely great burden of guilt; indeed, he himself is to blame for the fact that it came about at all!…”- from The Second Leaflet of The White Rose

It was only just this past December I obtained the film Sophie Scholl: The Final Days. Excellent! What impressed me most about the authenticity of its retelling of the story was that so much of the dialog was based on archival materials such as minutes from the trial/transcripts of the Gestapo interrogations. Also, the interviews (special features on the dvd) are a must to listen to. I found the interview with one of the Scholl sisters particularly of interest, with her sharing of Sophie’s personality.

Sophie Scholl’s strength is perfectly communicated throughout the film. The interrogation by Gestapo officer Robert Mohr of Sophie Scholl and her comments in court before Judge Roland Freisler (the “People’s Court” was its name though it was anything but with its proceedings conducted in secrecy and with no appeals permitted, set up by Hitler to stop political opposition ) make this film unique and informative to view. The courtroom scenes are powerful, with the words of these courageous resistors amazing in view of the tyranny they were denouncing. In their early twenties, the members of The White Rose were sentenced by Freisler to death and were executed immediately following the “trial.”

In The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich by William L. Shirer (a book I also recommend, having read it many years ago), Judge Roland Freisler is described as “perhaps the most sinister and bloodthirsty Nazi in the Third Reich after Heydrich.”

What did perplex me was why there was no depiction in the film of any mistreatment by the Gestapo upon Sophie Scholl and the others as they were notoriously known for their violent interrogation tactics, and I would think those accused of treason would have been subjected to such torture. I do not know if the Gestapo refrained from their methods in these cases, or if is uncertain if such tactics were used against the Scholls since some articles mention her leg being injured and others make no such mention.

However, in Shirer’s The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich he writes that, “Sophie Scholl was handled so roughly during her interrogation by the Gestapo that she appeared in court with a broken leg.”

“…why do you not bestir yourselves, why do you allow these men who are in power to rob you step by step, openly and in secret, of one domain of your rights after another, until one day nothing, nothing at all will be left but a mechanized state system presided over by criminals and drunks?…” - Excerpt from The Third Leaflet of The White Rose

I highly recommend and encourage you to visit the film’s website: Sophie Scholl: The Final Days to learn more about it; and an interview with its director Marc Rothemund.

I also recommend a piece by Jacob Hornberger: “The White Rose: A Lesson in Dissent” is an excellent article at The Future of Freedom website summarizing the Sophie Scholl and The White Rose story very well and it includes book recommendations about The White Rose.

And, the English translation of The White Rose pamphlets may be read here.

Finally, I recommend reading the memories of Dr. George J. Wittenstein who was a member of the inner circle of The White Rose.

John Adams

If you’re fascinated by history and in particular the foundation of liberty on which our nation was built, you will find watching “John Adams” satisfying.

“John Adams,” a most interesting 7-part miniseries originally aired on HBO in early 2008 (now available in a 3-dvd set), is based on the book John Adams by David McCullough. The film won 13 awards at the 60th Primetime Emmy Awards, a record for the miniseries category. Such recognition of the quality of the actors & casting of this production is not surprising, since the writing, cinematography, architecture & location shots, costumes, and overall realism and details of both the characters and sets is impressive.

Viewing it came at an opportune time for me as I was reading the letters between John Adams and his wife Abigail (intrigued by their communication which I found to be not only interesting in view of the history in the making which they were experiencing, but also the ideas, perceptions, and feelings they shared with one another as a couple.) Thus, I was looking forward to receiving the dvd set, and in watching the film, I learned much more and it increased my interest in reading more about Adams. In my opinion, the historical accuracy was intact and I learned much from this excellent biography (a few what I considered rather trivial inaccuracies have been mentioned in some reviews of the film, all of which I deemed unimportant and minor when compared with the overall highly accurate portrayal of both the man and of the history of our nation’s founding; thus I consider the film highly accurate and recommend it to others, like myself, who are fascinated by history and who have a particular interest in learning more about the lives of those who courageously chose liberty over tyranny).

The founding of this nation, the risks, the losses and suffering, and the spirit of a people seeking liberty was well represented. It is both a historical as well as a personal account of John Adams, played by Paul Giamatti. As I was reading the correspondence between the couple at the time, I recognized sentiments (if not direct quotes themselves) throughout the film reflecting well the two characters’ personalities. From his strengths, political stances, motivations, rivalries with others, to his weaknesses, the story is a vibrant account of not only Adams’ life, but also of many of those who shaped American history.

As for his wife, Abigail, actress Laura Linney was superb. Abigail Adams’ intellectual exchanges, spoken or written, appeared to reach her husband on a level no one else could, perhaps because her words - be they encouraging or even when challenging or in disagreement were always supportive of him and in harmony with the purpose and values both shared. He could trust her, thus he was receptive (and relinquished ego reactions which he sometimes succumbed to with others) when she shared thoughts with him.

I was particularly taken by the bitter debate between the representatives of the 13 colonies through the Continental Congress as they as disputed repeatedly the decision as to whether to break apart from Great Britain, the creation of The Declaration of Independence, and the characters as depicted of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington Alexander Hamilton, and Benjamin Franklin are outstanding.

Also, one of the most powerful aspects of this film was realizing that politics in America has from its inception been a dark arena of lies, deceit, strategy, and betrayal. Sadly, those unfortunate givens in politics today are nothing new, as they are simply the result of human beings, some making truth their priority and others making power their priority.

Human nature is well illustrated through the lives, both struggles and achievements, both political and personal, depicted of those whose vision for a nation founded on liberty created the United States of America. The struggles of the new nation, like the struggles of an individual, are made clear as principles and values are examined, tested, explored, compromised or held steadfast. Through their foibles and strengths, one can appreciate not only the great toil and danger of their task and the courage it required, but also that which they experienced as human beings with the same emotions and motivations we have today.

Independence has always required strength and perseverance, and the human spirit always requires independence.

I enjoyed and highly recommend the film “John Adams.” Read more about it at its Amazon page & its HBO page.

Welcome to Obama’s “New Era of Peace” - 22 Pakistanis reported dead

So much for the peace activists who supported Obama - how deluded could they be? To have expected (or “hoped”) for anything different was delusional.

Just like any warmonger, just like Bush, Obama put to use the same old policy of attacking and rationalizing the killing of Pakistanis. The death count as yet being reported is 22 (see ABC news & Press TV.)

What a start to Obama’s idea of an American “role in ushering in a new era of peace” which he spoke of in his inaugural address. Sadly, it is only the beginning of what will be continual bloodshed by the U.S. government under Obama’s presidency.

In his Obama expressed no rejection of the bogus “War on Terror.”

Quotes from Obama’s inaugural address; the words of a man who plans to continue the empire building:

“…Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred….
…And so to all the other peoples and governments who are watching today…know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more…
…and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan…
…we will defeat you…that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace…
…To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society’s ills on the West …
…we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains…We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty…”

In view of Obama’s above statements:
The truth is that our nation is not at war, although civilians worldwide will continue to die at the hands of the U.S. military.
Our nation has no business “leading” the world in any pursuit, but rather should ends its coercion and persecution of other governments, and respect their sovereignty.
Our nation has no right to continue its military assault on the people of Afghanistan. Rather all troops should be removed from not only Iraq and Afghanistan, but from the hundreds of military bases we maintain worldwide.
There is no one to “defeat”, but there will be many to defend against due to Obama’s continued violent assaults on people worldwide.
No one is blaming their “society’s ills on the West,” but many are enraged and seek vengeful retribution for the ills and violence we arrogantly inflict.
There is no place I can think matching Obama’s description of where Americans are guarding our “liberty” in “far-off deserts and distant mountains,” although our military will suffer more needless losses for a government agenda which has nothing to do with our security.

Thus, it is just as objectionable to hear Obama use words such as “peace,” “liberty,” and “dignity,” as it was to hear Bush.

And as for Obama’s ubiquitous presidential last line, “And God bless the United States of America.” Saying it doesn’t make it so. Will God continue to bless a nation which kills indiscriminately making it a nation which participates in and condones murder (which I define as unjustified killing), which invades and occupies sovereign nations, and which seeks to manipulate and control that which does not belong to it using its might to force others worldwide to acquiesce to its selfish agenda?

Keep in mind, Obama didn’t keep it hidden that he would continue such policies, no indeed. I highly recommend the following “St. Pete for Peace” webpage with its list of Obama quotations and positions.

Though the world can expect no change, we as Americans can expect more retributive and vindictive anger waged against us, not for our way of life, but for our way of imposing our will upon others. Obama, like past presidents, will make sure he keeps those “wars” going, with the missile attacks on Pakistan an ominous sign of what is to come.

Will there ever be a day when our military men and women’s lives are valued as so precious so as not to send them into harm’s way so needlessly and unjustly…and the same day when they are not ordered to needlessly and unjustly inflict harm upon innocent men, women and children?

The Obama body count has begun.

No Moving Forward If Serious Crimes by Government Ignored

Why are so many so easily dismissing the seeking of justice? Could it be that important issues such as treatment of detainees and even the invasion of Iraq were merely used by some to achieve political power for their party? And that once a politician from the political party they supported got that office, many of those clamoring on these issues will now just drop them? That’s the way it appears.

The commentary on Obama’s executive orders is abundant, with many expressing hopefulness that this signals a positive move forward. It is the correct thing to do, but yet doesn’t instill hope in me. Obama is a man who I believe grandstands, using rhetoric (and perhaps even his current actions) to continue the enthusiasm for his election. On a number of issues I have seen him try to play both sides which makes him untrustworthy to me even on an issue such as this on which I agree with his words. Nevertheless the actions recently taken are the right moves, but only if they are followed up with correct, just, and timely actions. Only time will tell.

But in these past few days what has been most disgusting is to see so many of those who rightly condemned Bush and his gang for illegal war, torture, abuse, violations of privacy/communications of the American people, and other evils now turning their head away from seeking from justice. Numerous comments on political articles show a huge number of people who sought the closing of Guantanamo, who opposed torture, and who rightly identified numerous wrongdoings of Bush and his administration, now have no interest in demanding justice. They claim they want to move “forward” and not be caught up in the “past.”

I cannot begin to understand how one could identify such crimes for what they are and be willing to drop the cause simply because there is a new president. That is, unless many of those used real issues simply as a political strategy.

Where probable cause and evidence exists that such serious crimes have been committed, it should be used in prosecuting those responsible. No exceptions.

But instead, in April, Obama stated, “I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of the Republicans as a partisan witch hunt, because I think we’ve got too many problems to solve.”

How could anyone who truly placed human rights as a priority, care more about what an opposing political party thinks rather than pursuit of justice?

He even went further, with more examples of his trying to please everyone rhetoric in saying he rejected impeachment , as it should “be reserved for exceptional circumstances.” And in the same answer, he says he’d support an investigation to determine if are there were possibilities “of genuine crimes as opposed to really bad policies.” He wanted it both ways on the campaign trail, giving answers meant to please everyone, and giving himself the “out” of being able to evaluate his predecessor’s administration as simply engaging in “bad policies” should he decide not to take action.

Biden has been no different in answering questions as to whether the administration would advocate prosecution of high level Bush administration officials, as when he was asked on This Week with host George Stephanopoulos, he replied giving lip service to it being a decision of the Justice Dept., but reiterating the same message as Obama saying, they are “focusing on the future.” “I think we should be looking forward, not backwards.” What is backwards about demanding justice for criminals?

Which, too, leads me to again view Obama as duplicitous - saying the right words with token actions, but instilling no confidence in me that he will fulfill the hopes of those who seek justice on behalf of those who have lost their lives and been persecuted by the U.S. government. It seems Obama, like many of those who supported him and who claimed to care about human rights abuses, can dispense with the true cause of justice now that they won the election. I can think of nothing more deplorable than using human rights issues to further one’s political agenda, and until and if Obama seeks justice for the crimes committed I doubt his sincerity. Consistency on these issues is the only thing that can build trust. This nation must not allow allow the Executive Branch and its officials and its government “intelligence” agencies to blatantly disregard the rule of law. The law is not (or shall I say should not) be relative to who violated it.

Yet many are now willing to drop those issues they once claimed to be so important. Perhaps it is because they themselves or someone they cared about didn’t suffer. Have you ever heard of a murder victim’s family saying they didn’t want to see prosecution of the perpetrator (though they may differ on what they think the sentencing should be, almost all, if not all, seek prosecution.) I’ve never heard a family member of someone who has been murdered say, “I’d rather just move forward and put it in the past.” No. They always seek prosecution and justice.

And, this seeking of justice, would be the natural demand of anyone who truly empathizes with the immoral and illegal suffering this government has inflicted and the laws it has broken. It’s not enough to “identify” the purported perpetrator of a crime, it is imperative that the crime and its perpetrators be brought to justice. As it is with individuals, so it must be with our nation and those who gave such orders. In matters of humanity, of life and death, you cannot remain impartial.

An investigation is warranted, truth must be determined as to who is responsible, and prosecution of those who violated the law. Although the evil inflicted cannot be undone, it demands that it be exposed to all the world and that those responsible be held accountable.

For Obama that would be hard since it looks like he’s afraid of being accused of a “partisan witch hunt.” He cares more what people think and say than for justice, which makes him no different than the worst of politicians - always caring about public perception and political expediency instead of what is right. Again, time will tell what Obama and his Attorney general actually value. But there will be no moving forward for this nation if such serious crimes are ignored.

“So Much To Be Undone” by Eugene Robinson

This morning, I read the following excellent editorial by Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post. It perfectly expreses my feelings and thoughts regarding Obama’s executive orders regarding detainees and Guantanamo. I highly recommend Robinson’s op-ed:

So Much To Be Undone

I agree with all of Robinson’s points, with the exception of that I do feel if evidence from such an investigation is sufficient for prosecution, it should be done, regardless of those who need to be charged. I believe justice must also be sought.

Will Justice be Sought?

Barack Obama, Independence, MO, June 30, 2008, “…I remember, when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, listening to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad. That’s my idea of America…”

Such an America demands that those who have purportedly violated federal law be criminally investigated, and if evidence is brought forth that crimes have been committed, that those believed to be responsible be brought to justice. It demands that the President who has sworn to, “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” do so. Does Obama want his “idea” to remain just that, or will he make the seeking of justice the priority it should be, and thereby move the “idea” into reality? No one should be above the law. Does Obama believe in accountability? Does he believe the rule of law applies to all? Were those just fine words, mere rhetoric, or does he really empathize with those who have suffered injustices?

Pertaining to the topic of justice and Bush and his administration, several recent articles & opinion pieces I found of particular interest, and which I recommend:

No Reckoning for Bush
by Suzanne Goldenberg, Jan. 22, 2009

The effects of Obama’s refusal to investigate Bush crimes
by Glenn Greenwald, Jan. 20, 2009

Betraying the Legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King
by Andrew Hughes, Jan. 18, 2009

Turley: Obama ‘owns’ Bush ‘war crimes’ if he looks the other way
by David Edwards and Muriel Kane, Jan. 13, 2009

Prosecuting Bush
by Jacob G. Hornberger, Jan. 13, 2009

100 Days Checklist
Counter terror with justice: A 17 point checklist for President Barack Obama
by Amnesty International

Why all the hoopla over Obama’s inauguration?

Obama doesn’t care about freedom - not yours as an American, and certainly not that of foreigners. He is neither benevolent or enlightened. So what’s to celebrate?

The hopeful image of a United States with a president who cares about peace and justice has served its purpose - it got him elected.

The American people, in looking for their own “benevolent dictator,” don’t trust themselves. In choosing Obama they’ve said they’d rather the government take their money since it will better know how to spend it for them. And take it he will. In George Stephanopoulos’ Jan. 10, 2009 interview with him, Obama said, “Everybody’s going to have to give. Everybody’s going to have to have some skin in the game,” to achieve his goals.

He wraps himself in the flag and wants to present an image as if caring about the Constitution and the law, but like his predecessor it’s just lip-service. He’ll continue his grandiose talk, make a few symbolic, more than anything else, gestures to appear as if he values freedom upon entering office, and proceed to make things worse.

Not because the new president changes any of the longstanding policies of the federal government, but precisely because he continues them with a fervor. Massive government spending, as bad as it is, will increase. Assuming a nonexistent prerogative to intrude into people’s personal and economic lives will increase. Persecution and murder (which I define as unjustified killing) of other people worldwide will continue.

For someone who taught constitutional law, his massive plans for government control of many areas of our lives shows he doesn’t either understand or flat out doesn’t respect the fundamental purpose of our Constitution - to limit the power of the federal government. Obviously unrestrained by that, Obama’s plans will result in denial of rights, more debt, and a government without any limit to the areas in which it will intrude. I don’t see any plans mentioned to curtail the powers Bush allocated for himself and the office of presidency. In other words, no meaningful change on the horizon.

With Obama, America will suffer under more big government - big government spending and control. The many crises will exacerbate as the nation caves in from expansion of the government policies which created the crises in the first place.

As far as I can see, there’s not one issue on which Obama is for freedom.

Cuba for example. Lifting of travel sanctions and easing of others sounds favorable. But why stop there if freedom were actually your guiding principle? Such promises, if acted upon, are part of a greater plan to yet force Cuba to become what the US government wants it to be. Different tactics - same agenda. One who valued freedom would end the embargo upon entering office. To place demands (no matter how good they sound such as freeing of political prisoners, free elections, etc.) is to again exert pressure so the US might attain what it wants. But “might” doesn’t make “right.” Sovereign nations should operate as they choose, and the U.S. should simply leave them alone. But, of course, when it served him he claimed he wanted to end the embargo (video from 2004), but now as president he’s going to maintain current U.S. policy.

As for education, Obama states, “We’ll keep our promise to every young American–if you commit to serving your community and your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.” “If you commit to serving,”? That’s right, 100 hours of “public service” would “give” you a $4,000 tax credit for college tuition. Mandatory “service” in exchange for a “tax credit” is not freedom. And neither is economic favoritism based upon career choice such as “this pledge: If you commit your life to teaching, America will pay for your college education.” Obama has yet another of his long lists of all his plans for education, but none address the core problem which is public education itself. I’d also note that a free society educates itself by practicing free speech - yet another area which may be threatened under an Obama White House.

Foreign policy is a big one for Obama. Or shall we say interventionism is a big one with his enormous (doubling) of foreign aid, continued death and maiming of innocents worldwide by our troops in areas of the world we have no business being in. Frankly, I haven’t any clue as to how so many “peace activists” supported this man whose stances are anything but peaceful. Obama, like past presidents, intends to use the “carrot” of foreign aid to get leverage in other nations essentially forcing them to cooperate with his agenda or else they’ll reap a beating with the stick of US military and economic might. It doesn’t matter what nation we’re considering, be it Israel, Pakistan, Cuba…Obama intends to offer rewards for compliance with US government agenda and withhold them (or worse) if he doesn’t get what he wants. Sadly, many more innocent civilians, as in Afghanistan, will die because of Obama’s “foreign policy.” Obama will do nothing to change our government’s imperialistic policies.

There will be no end in sight for “The War on Terror.” He’ll exploit the 9/11 tragedy just as Bush/Cheney did. Count on more “emergencies” or “crises” emphasized which Obama will request you put your trust in him and his administration.

Think he cares for political prisoners and detainees? No. Just another of the hot issues he used to try and make himself appear as if he cares about peace and justice. He has made some statements which if implemented would be good (remarks against torture and camps such as Guantánamo), but I do not trust him. Already back peddling on Guantánamo, I see no real “justice” for them occurring and certainly not for all the others unjustly held worldwide, without due process, in prisons for the US government. It is yet another example which garners people’s praise and hope, and he exploits it well. If Obama truly believed in justice, and wasn’t just using Guantánamo to political advantage, he would be adding his voice and support to the criminal investigation of and prosecution of any in the previous administration - from Bush down - who may be guilty of federal crimes.

Obama in his April 23, 2007 speech to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs:
“We must lead by building a 21st century military to ensure the security of our people and advance the security of all people…the ability to put boots on the ground will be critical in eliminating the shadowy terrorist networks we now face…how America’s larger purpose in the world is to promote the spread of freedom – that it is the yearning of all who live in the shadow of tyranny and despair. I agree….it’s about showing the world that America stands for something – that we can still lead.” Translation: continued interventionism worldwide.

His foreign policy is similar to what he intends to do domestically. Obey and receive his rewards, refuse and things you’ve earned and deserve will be withheld. “Service” is a twisted concept when Obama and his chief of staff speak of it. Who among us would equate compulsory work for the government with volunteering? One way or another, Obama appears intent on bringing back the draft, he just wants to avoid using the terms such as conscription. Look at his extensive “service” programs including “high school students should be expected to engage in community service for 50 hours annually during the school year or summer months.” Withholding and denying formal recognition of one’s education which they’ve achieved (diploma for example) unless they “serve” the government isn’t freedom. Who knows what else Obama will devise in order to force from American citizens to “serve” the government.

Obama is a gun control proponent but like many politicians plays both sides acting like he believes in the U.S. Constitution while simultaneously and in the same breath justifying anti-Constitutional anti-freedom positions. Obama, “ As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can’t constrain the exercise of that right, in the same way that we have a right to private property but local governments can establish zoning ordinances that determine how you can use it.” Well, the 2nd amendment of our Constitution is much more than a “general principle,” and while it provides for personal protection and recreational uses, it is in the Constitution because it was considered the people’s last refuge against tyranny.

Economically? It should seem obvious and go without saying that there’s no way our economy can withstand Obama’s big spending. His massive government programs alone, not to mention his “economic stimulus” and “bailout” plans, aren’t paid for out of thin air. It’s not his job to “create jobs” or to invest in any industry such as alternative fuels. The “free” market will likely be even more burdened with more regulation and taxation, with all manner of other economic interventionism effectively eliminating any chance of a free market emerging which could actually help our economy. His multiple federal rescues, from healthcare (”I’ve said is that I believe we can have universal health care in this country by the end of the next president’s first term. By the end of my first term as president of the United States of America.“[before Planned Parenthood Action Fund] to education to plans to address “global climate change,” will weaken this nation to the core. To increase taxation on one group to fund giveaway programs for others is not only immoral and unjust, it will harm the economy. Wealth doesn’t come from government, only thievery and enslavement.

Social Security is yet another area where words meant to comfort and alleviate the fears of the American people are used. To “ensure,” “strengthen,” “protect,” “expand,” and to “reform”. Rather than “reform” why not allow Americans to have the freedom to keep their money and take care of themselves?

Or take social issues which the federal government shouldn’t be involved in whatsoever. For instance, on the drug war there’s no telling what Obama really thinks. Now, it appears Obama doesn’t really oppose the drug war, he just thinks he can do it better with more government programs meant to reduce drug dependency. Freedom would mean an end to the horrors of the drug war entirely. Or another social issue, abortion, since Obama views a baby as punishment (clip of Obama discussing if his unwed daughters got pregnant and were “punished with a baby“) it seems he thinks everyone has a right to be bailed out of such a situation (with taxpayer money through his universal healthcare perhaps?). I recall his “Well, the first thing I’d do as president is, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” (federal legislation eliminating all state laws regarding abortion) told to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. Obama, in the same speech referred to himself as teaching “Constitutional Law” but somehow he always seems to forget about Tenth Amendment.

Those are but a few issues, indicative of Obama’s mindset and what’s in store for the nation and world. No change just more government interventionism at every level. And a McCain administration would have essentially been no different (it may have had differing focuses but the result would be the same because the premise is the same.)

Despite appearances, I think the American people will one day return to individualism, independence, self-reliance and choose to be free from the oppression of the big government policies politicians such as Obama and McCain support. Americans will remove their blinders, see what hasn’t worked, and no more place foolish trust in fine rhetoric, campaign slogans, and promises from candidates whose goal is maintain an imperialistic agenda abroad and a centrally planned economy domestically. They’ll grow weary of suffering from the heavy hand of government and its oppression, learning from their lack of liberty to finally appreciate and crave it.

Rejecting both the warfare and welfare state and anyone who advocates its continuance, they’ll choose liberty. That will be historic and celebratory.

Then the change we need will occur.

My Plans for 2009

I am in receipt of quite a number of email inquiries asking what my plans may be for the coming year.

First, let me express my appreciation to those who have written. Although I am unable timewise to always send reply messages, I take this opportunity to thank you for your interest and your expressions of support.

In the past two weeks alone (not to mention the numerous inquiries over the last several months) my inbox has received more inquiries as to what my plans in regards to my work for liberty might be. Those plans, like all I decide to do in life, are interrelated to everything going on in my life.

Tomorrow, January 16, is my birthday. I’ve never been one to give much thought to it. Age, time, distance…all are meaningless measurements useful only to human plans and synchronization of activities, but irrelevant to spirit. What matters is what you do in the life you are given. What matters is who you are.

I like this quote: “A birthday is just the first day of another 365-day journey around the sun. Enjoy the trip.” I am enjoying the trip! In fact, though my chronological age is 42, I feel like a girl in every way and it is how I perceive myself. I take delight in life, in learning, seeing and experiencing new things. I love life!

Thus, I share with you my plans for 2009:

Public office?

A number of you continue to ask and strongly suggest I run for public office, perhaps in Colorado (or otherwise). I have no plan or interest in doing so. I believe the political parties and the electoral process in this nation to be spiritually corrupt. Rather than a field of ideas being debated, examined, and brought forth, it is a snake pit where few can be trusted and to get ahead often requires selling out your principles and values (which many are more than willing to do). Truth is not valued or cherished. Anyone who would compromise matters of such importance never truly held those ideals or beliefs to begin with; it was merely a convenient means to use for whatever personal/social/or power agenda one wanted to gain. Political parties and elections in this nation have little to do with differing ideas being presented as a means to make things better, and everything to do with worship of and gaining of power. It is an area dominated by those who believe in lies, deceit, betrayal, sabotage, and all other manner of unethical practices.

I feel my efforts are better utilized for our cause through other areas rather than running for any office. I thank those who continue to write offering both financial and other support if I were to choose to seek elected office. Your libertarian values, and belief in my ability to bring them to the public as a candidate, is appreciated. But it is not the course I wish to take at this time. I choose instead to work for liberty in other ways which I feel will be more effective based on my own experience and observation.

Articles

I love writing. What a wonderfully gratifying experience it is to do what one loves and make your living at it. Although (to pay the bills) I actually work on a variety of general interest freelance pieces, it is the writing of articles from my heart that are most gratifying. For it is there my voice can make the most difference.

As I seek to grow in my life, it gives me great satisfaction to realize that what I write can help other people grow in their understanding of liberty and what it means to be free. I frequently receive email letters expressing appreciation for certain articles I’ve written. It means so much to me when someone takes their time to let me know that they found something I wrote to be valuable or insightful to them. I am happily continuing to write articles sharing libertarianism in both print and online publications.

 New Book

I am also currently working on a book - political, libertarian, and with a subject unlike any other book I’m aware of.  After my presidential campaign, I received a couple offers from publishers telling me they were interested in publishing a book from me. I did not take them up on it, as it was not the right time for me.

Now, I am motivated, inspired and stronger than ever in not only expressing my political views and perspectives in writing, but in my conviction that doing so makes a difference. I am happy when I write pieces that may open people to new ways of looking at things and which challenge false concepts. The book I am writing will be powerful in elucidating matters not previously addressed in the libertarian movement before. Right now, I am focused on the book development and writing so as to prepare it and its synopsis to submit to possible publishers in the future. I will continue to write freelance articles, but in addition, as time permits, I will be working on my new book.

 The Unknown

And I am one who remains open to yet unknown possibilities and opportunities that may also manifest in my life. I’ve learned in life that unexpected and unanticipated developments can arise which may alter plans or add new ones. Sometimes these can be both wonderful and miraculous. Knowing when to continue, deviate, or adjust to new situations is wisdom. The destination will be reached as more and more of us place truth as our priority and commit to doing that which we can. I will courageously and boldly use my heart and mind together to help be part of restoring our republic through whatever means presents itself and seems good to pursue. I will pray for guidance, and follow where I am led.

Dissemination of Ideas

I believe the key to advancing liberty in this nation lies not (yet) in the voting booth, but in the dissemination of ideas. Until it becomes the will of the people to hold tight claim to the freedom they were born with, elections are for the most part meaningless. While we have our work cut out for us as libertarians, we do have an opportune time to boldly share our convictions with others. People are hungry for solutions and are becoming fed up with the problems being exacerbated by the very politicians who continue to claim they’ll make things better.

The greater headway we make in the sharing of libertarian ideas, the more apt larger numbers of the populous will begin to actively reject statism in the voting booth in candidates and policy.

Nothing will have greater overall impact on where this nation is headed than more and more people from all walks of life embracing liberty and thereby courageously standing up for it right where they live and work. The power of this idea alone, of liberty, is enormous. It must be elucidated so most begin to look at it not as some distant ideology to which one gives lip service, but as the prerequisite to any happiness one may hope to enjoy. Once people begin to associate principles of libertarianism with every aspect of their daily life and make the link that only through it might they really live to the fullest, unrestrained, unhindered, unburdened, both economically and personally, will they heartily join us.

I am dedicated to disseminating the truth through my daily life, writing, public speaking, radio appearances, local activism, and supporting the work of others whom I believe and trust have the same commitment (they are rare). I also welcome and seek to learn from the work, experience and advice of other libertarians.

Different people process ideas and learn differently, and this is why it is essential that all libertarians share their perspective at every opportunity. You will never know how your unique expression, your words, your way of explaining something will reach someone who relates to the message as it could have been delivered only by you.

This nation has strayed so far from its founding principles it takes each and every one of us to be involved in sharing the libertarian philosophy and its real world benefits with all.  This is why all my activities will focus upon the dissemination of ideas.

The Student Prince

For many years, I have appreciated classical music. With many cds in my personal collection (and always adding more), it is only recently that I have begun exploring opera outside of individual selections by composers as Mozart, Wagner, Verdi, Puccini, etc.

For the first time I am listening to operatic music, as a means of storytelling, as it was composed and written for. To listen to entire operas from beginning to end is a new experience for me, and I am finding myself quite taken by this art form.

Last night I listened to the 1 1/2 hours of music from the operetta The Student Prince with Mario Lanza. Beautiful.

My interest in the outcome of the story was held throughout. Unfamiliar with the ending, I enjoyed following the story as it unfolded in song. This is another example (among a few others recently) which has developed an appreciation of the opera and makes me interested in experiencing viewing an opera performance on stage. (I’ve attended only one opera many years ago.)

Based on Wilhelm Meyer-Förster’s play Alt Heidelberg, the music is by Sigmund Romberg with lyrics by Dorothy Donnelly. I was delighted to recognize several pieces I’ve heard and liked before but never realized they were from The Student Prince. Others I expected, and enjoyed hearing again.

The celebration of spring, friendships made at university, and love were all perfectly communicated in the music.

I will make no comment on the outcome for those of you who have yet to hear or watch its performance. True love, a relationship based on whole appreciation for another and a concern for their happiness, is rare. I’ll say only that the story left me focused upon the importance of decisions one makes and that which is made a priority in one’s life. Is love something one would give up what is pre-planned for their life or does one follow the expectations of others? Would true love lead one to venture off the set course that was planned for them? This is the question the student prince must answer for himself.

In some ways The Student Prince is reminiscent of the true story of Prince of Wales Edward VIII who fell in love with American female Wallis Simpson. In his abdication speech in 1936, giving up his British throne, he said he could no longer continue to fulfill his duties “without the woman I love.” Due to his royalty, it was scandalous. He was a prince, such as in the operatta, who fell in love with someone who wasn’t of royal blood. So the theme of The Student Prince is not without its parallels in history, and take away the royalty part, and I’m sure it has been experienced to one degree or another by many in the situation of deciding whether they will make a choice for love which, if taken, will change their lives significantly. Be it perhaps between decision of career, where to live, or any other important life choice and that of a relationship (if it is a rare situation where the two are mutually exclusive), such questions are universal in the human experience. It is in such times that what we value most becomes apparent. Nobody else but the individual can decide what is right for them, but one’s beliefs and priorities, based on the values placed in one’s heart, will determine the choices made throughout life and the subsequent blessings or sorrows.

The human experience celebrated and explored through opera is relatively new to me, but so far each of those I’ve familiarized myself with have been poignant in story, beautiful in song, and filled with the emotions of all mankind making the stories timeless. I will be and look forward to exploring more operas.

For Prosperity & Peace - Freedom works. Fear Does Not.

For the last three weeks there’s been a continual debate in the letters to the editor section of my local newspaper regarding where the country is headed with lots of discussion referencing socialism and capitalism - with free market capitalism repeatedly attacked with the most egregious of “arguments.” Most writers favor government involvement in one form or another to “stimulate” the economy and to help ease people’s hardship. One letter writer went so far as to say now is the time for dramatically increasing government spending as it will solve everything. Reading the paper, and realizing such opinions reflect that of many Americans, is certainly a motivator for libertarians to more than ever stay strongly committed to exposing the fallacies of government intervention in the economy. We do have our work of sharing ideas cut out for us - hey, but at least people are discussing these matters now and that provides us many opportunities to share.

The fear mongers (presenting themselves and often sincerely believing themselves to be putting forth a compassionate viewpoint) blame every social ill from lack of affordable medical care to homelessness, educational woes to the economic crisis the entire nation is suffering, on capitalism. The word “globalization” is often also, along with that of “capitalism” frequently invoked in a most condemnatory manner as if it is the great evil of our time. But I view a truly free market as not only the best means, but the only moral means, for economic growth and ultimate prosperity for a nation.

I do not fear unfettered commerce between nations as I do not fear reliance on any region of the world for resources, nor do I fear immigrants in the workforce - frankly, I’m glad for them all. But it seems many fear anything that’s unregulated, imagining all manner of exploitation unless government controls human actions (ironically, they fail to see just how exploited they are by the government). It is often those that claim the attainment of “peace” as their goal in life who most vehemently think government involvement in our economic lives to be the answer. But, as one who values peace, I know that it is attained only when both parties in a conflict value the truth. What works - works. Freedom works. Fear does not. In view of that, I share an essay I wrote several months ago about globalization and the oft cited fears of those who oppose it:

Globalization - Friend or Foe?

Prosperity.  Peace.  Both are desperately sought and intricately reliant upon the other; wealth and harmony aren’t some magical possessions bestowed upon an individual, a community, or a nation.  They are the direct result of applying human intent.  They are measured, increased and reduced by the mind of man.  Supply and demand works.  As Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations, observed “The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market.”

Throughout history, harmonious co-existence has always been linked directly to the self-interests of each party.  Cooperation, and thus prosperity and peace, exists when each participant is aware  the other’s success is directly related to the attainment of his own.  Thereby nations, their societies and the business communities within each, grow - expanding their material wealth -  even as a peaceful equilibrium  is established.  The laborers (who are both the producers and consumers) benefit as each engages in mutually beneficial transactions (be it in services, good, metals, or currency) free from interference from any third party.  Or as Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations, “Labour, therefore, is the real measure of the exchangeable value of all commodities.”  Supply and demand works.

The intrinsic beauty of such mutually beneficial commerce is that it encourages productivity, creativity, ingenuity, and excellence – characteristics which benefit all in society.  Specialized knowledge and expertise is rewarded, as is efficiency.  As one excels and develops their skill, they reap the rewards.

In the absence of such “selfish” (defined here as being motivated by one’s self-interest) cooperation, conflicts arise (be they between nations, corporations, communities, or individuals) eradicating wealth and peace as resources are wasted and destroyed.  Productivity comes to a halt.  The market has been limited.  Maintaining focus on self-interests maintains the need for production and output, as each party is reliant upon the other.  Division of labor works, and increases exponentially, as differences are put aside to facilitate creation of an ever-expanding marketplace.

The 21st century’s advances have more than ever before in our history created an atmosphere of virtually unlimited global communication and transfer of goods.  We have proved Adam Smith’s assertion again and again, with our prosperous global economy fully exemplifying his statements. Exchanges of services and products occur routinely between individuals and corporations worldwide, with individuals and nations alike benefiting.  For as individuals reap the rewards of their specialized labor, so too their society prospers.  As division of labor increases, markets to trade with grow resulting  in lower production costs, lower prices for goods, and even more mutually beneficial transactions. 

It stands to reason then, that with the enormous market available to all due to technological and communication advances, this point in history is an opportune time for virtually limitless prosperity and peace.  Adam Smith would be in awe of the huge market place, and its prerequisite of the most intricate diversity of specialized and individualized division of labor.  This worldwide phenomenon has reached its greatest scale ever, and we call it globalization.

Some regard globalization as a shift in our cultural identification, in actuality existence of multinational corporations (and thus multinational cooperation) is not the result of shared cultural values, but the flow of money and commodities creating alliances between markets and thereby cultures that didn’t exist before.  Globalization is the natural result of people acting upon their self-interests.  It’s the win-win reality Adam Smith saw for both producer and consumer alike – only on a grander scale than he ever imagined.
 
The power of exchange as we know it, this era of globalization, is the building block of civilizations’ future advancements in science, medicine, health, travel, communication, food production, and more. It fosters human ingenuity.  It is the essence to human societal development bringing prosperity and peace to all peoples.  Globalization destroys barriers, real or imagined,  which prevented such harmony.  It is the key to mankind’s future.

With this in mind, should globalization be aided by government in an affirmative way to facilitate advancement of society economically?  Would such regulation help create a “fairer” playing field so all people have an equal opportunity to not only survive but thrive in this new global market?  Or would we be playing with fire with such well-intentioned adjustments?
 
The dangers of government intrusion into the marketplace, far outweigh any perceived “benefit.” Regardless of the situation or fear-based imaginations of possible dire futures of an uncontrolled market, there is not a single instance where government intrusion would benefit the people  and their economic situation in the long run.  All government regulation, moderation, or control of the free market, in the end, limits the scale of the market and thus always limits division of labor. Consequently, people suffer.

So why do so many express trepidation and fear about globalization.  Let’s examine just a few of the arguments that have been posed:

FEAR OF DEPENDENCY:  We are all dependent on many people worldwide for the goods and services we use every day.  There is no reason to fear such interdependence, only reason to celebrate in gratitude that we live in a world that has made division of labor the fundamental basis both economically and socially in this great and expansive world market so easy.  Think a market selling its goods to the United States is suddenly going to cut us off?  How absurd.  Why would any nation do so when they themselves benefit financially from trading with us.  On the contrary, international trade raises the standard of living for all, and greatly decreases the risk of war between trading nations and peoples.  As more and more nations prosper by engaging in free trade, wars lessen and economies flourish.
 
FEAR OF EXPLOITATION: The most egregious exploitation of workers occurs in totalitarian societies. On the other hand, capitalistic free market societies (proportionate to the degree they  actually possess a free market) allow for competition even amongst employers for employees, especially the more divided (specialized) the labor force.  As markets grow the increased demand for labor results in increased benefit to the workers (not less).
 
FEAR OF BIG CORPORATIONS, LOSS OF JOBS AND LOW WAGES:  It is when a society is thriving and rapidly growing economically that wages are highest.  As inhabitants increase, demands increase, and employment opportunities increase (yet another benefit of free immigration). Only stagnation in societal and economic growth (imposed controls/regulations & burdensome taxation) stops growth and thereby hinders both wages as well as work opportunities. Low wages result when there is a lack of competition within a depressed economy plagued by high taxation, costs of compliance with  burdensome regulation, and unjust favoritism bestowed upon some private enterprise sectors above others.  Savings/investments, another sign of prosperity, boom when the people have a free market resulting in low inflation and currency of value – all of which occurs in a society free of big government spending and control.  
 
There’s nothing to fear from big business which grows to a successful size purely by innovation in a free market economy, but there is much to be gravely concerned about when big businesses are essentially built by government favoritism and intervention in the form of non-competitive or excessive contracts, subsidies, targeted tax cuts for specific industries, and bail-outs.
 
Although emotionally based fear mongers mistakenly blame the free market as the corrupt influence responsible for economic suffering, the fact remains the most hideous and harmful corruption is that of government intrusion into an otherwise efficient market in the form of regulations, subsidies, price caps, tariffs, embargoes, government purchases and storage of surplus crops, and other controls.  The federal government also severely disrupts the marketplace by imposition of immigration controls and persecution of  (non-citizens) immigrants who seek work.

Further, the scores of federal agencies charged with regulating commerce (including so called protection agencies for the environment, health, etc.) are costing billions of dollars, with businesses passing down costs to consumers.
 
The precise costs is hard to calculate due to its enormity, but here are just a few of the facts about regulations’ impact on the free market in the United States (data quoted  from The Ten Thousand Commandments report of the CEI-Competitive Enterprise Institute, An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State, 2008 edition, by Clyde Wayne Crews Jr): “Regulation costs more than seven times the $163 billion budget deficit; Regulations dwarf the $150 billion“economic stimulus package” passed in early 2008, and their rollback would constitute the deregulatory stimulus that the U.S. economy needs; Of  the 3,882 regulations now in the works, 757 affect small business.”

As the federal government forces the private sector (and states and communities) to pay for enormous regulatory costs without objective accountability, the people who are directly affected (measurably in every area of their lives as higher burdens are placed on businesses) have no representation in the matter.   The  American people are only aware of the the more familiar regulatory agencies ones such as the FCC, the FDA,the EPA, FTC (Federal Trade Commission), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but the agencies (and the rules) number in the hundreds.
 
The wasteful cost of regulation is due to government assuming the inappropriate prerogative of trying to facilitate the market.  Again, government hinders the division of labor and the extent of the market in the name of trying to assist the people.

Nearly every federal department is involved in some way which affects the free market adversely.  The common denominator:  control over areas which should be left entirely to competitive markets where the people will determine the outcome (failure or success) of any enterprise.  Central planning (any attempt at economic equity through social or corporate welfare) by the government, be it in the form of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, protectionism of  selected industries, minimum wage, increased taxation of the wealthy, all result in bankruptcy of society.   

Examples of unintended consequences of government intrusion to “facilitate” economic or social difficulties abound, to name just a very few: the savings and loan crisis of the 1980’s, the Mississippi River levee design and construction, rent control leading to shortages in housing (administered for the state of New York by the federal government from 1943-1950), the complete waste of billions of taxpayer dollars (since 1980)  on the subsidizing of ethanol (and unjust economic repercussions on others in agriculture such as largely unsubsidized soybean farmers, and livestock producers who rely on (the now inflated) corn and thus pass the costs down to the consumer). The market is huge; the division of labor at its height; left to the free market so many areas the government now involves itself in would be thriving, rather than draining our nation economically.  The free market will always provide superior services and goods, at lower prices, than government programs.

As government regulation (and spending and taxation) increases manifold, the people suffer. Whatever economic (or social)  area, issue or problem the government purports to try and help – it harms.  Ironically, as the economy falters, many look to the government to save them, their businesses, their homes, from collapse.  But the government, in all these cases, is to blame for the situation to begin with.
 
The more socialistic programs, the greater the people suffer. Socialism weakens people, morally debilitates them, and economically destroys them.

Our nation has suffered not because of big corporations and today’s globalization, but because of big government control over what should have remained the domain of the free market ever since the New Deal in the 1930’s.  That decision, and its socialistic programs, was a prime example of government trying to facilitate “a good cause.”  The result: the extremely difficult situation Americans find themselves in economically. Had our nation not embraced such rampant government economic regulation, but instead embraced the principles of the free market and a limited government, we would be prospering.  The economic distortions resulting from government regulation, taxation, tariffs, subsidies and other favoritism harm everyone.
 
Fairness (and prosperity) is the natural result of a people motivated by compensation; but guilt (as if they, the people, are financially responsible for the well being of others) is the powerful fear tactic used against the people to make them cooperative economic slaves.  Ironically, any attempt by government to intervene in the market causes the exact opposite of the desired result.  

If those who seek a fairer society come to recognize that moving toward genuinely free markets will advance, and not hinder, their goals, then they will point their efforts to achieve less government involvement for the benefit of everyone.The natural market process works. Should individuals (or corporations) make unwise choices in a true free market, they suffer the consequences and fail.  If choices are favorable, they succeed.  At no time, should government intrude to favor some while others suffer at their expense. Any intrusion into the free market irreparably harms society.Markets do not fail (any lulls self-correct), but nearly everything referred to as “market failure” throughout history has actually been the result of economic problems created by government intrusion.

The growth of Western civilization in the 19th century found a strong market and small government.  After World War I, some governments assumed greater power (as in the Soviet Union), or for our nation, after the Great Depression and following World War II, when belief in greater government planning (security) became the rule.  In the last forty years, such socialistic ideology and its prerequisite big government is being identified as the culprit in our social ills.  Once again, human nature is winning, as people return advocating smaller government and a free market.  

Any society which aspires to develop the optimal division of labor characterizing productive economies must focus not on government intervention, but on staunch protection of private property, likewise protection of free association with others in immigration and unrestricted trade, maintenance of a currency of value, little or no taxation, and most importantly of all: personal responsibility.  The government has no business interfering in the business of free enterprise.

Government just needs to stay out of the way, and let natural human interaction illustrate the political theory Adam Smith elucidated.  True cooperation among people, free from any government coercion, satisfies not only the need for necessities, but provides a  prosperity where people flourish enhancing their lives.

Globalization will benefit each society in direct proportion to the degree said society respects human nature: recognizing the good of free migration, permitting different cultures and nations to freely interact and engage in trade, and allowing the people to keep the money they earn to spend-give-and save as they choose.  

It is time to boldly oppose those who think the government should meddle in any private enterprise/private sector activities.  It is time to give a true free market an opportunity to save America from the dangerous downward economic spiral it’s on due solely to big government.  Supply and demand works.  Government involvement hurts.

The global economy is growing fast. Unfettered globalization is the friend of all.  It offers unlimited possibilities worldwide for the standard of living of millions to rise. It’s time to expand the market, no limitations, so the division of labor increases manifold and prosperity is restored to our nation.
In short, it’s time for economic freedom…because freedom works!